Democratic Uganda is witnessing history as President Yoweri Museveni prepares to begin his unprecedented seventh term in office. At 81 years old, Museveni has addressed widespread concerns about his age, insisting that he is “not dead or senile” and that his wealth of experience remains a vital asset for the nation.
In a recent interview with Sky News at the Nakasero State Lodge, Museveni spoke candidly about his vision for Uganda in the coming years. He emphasized that his age should not be seen as a limitation but as a testament to the knowledge and leadership skills he has accumulated over decades.
“If I am still available, not dead or senile, I am still around and I have some knowledge; if you are serious about your country, why would you not want to take advantage of me?” Museveni said. These remarks came amid public debates on whether Uganda needs fresh leadership or the continuation of experienced governance.
Museveni argued that history had proven the electorate’s preference for capable leadership. He stated that if a better leader had existed during previous election cycles, Ugandans would have elected them instead. His words reflected confidence in his record and in the democratic choices of his citizens.
On January 15, 2026, the Electoral Commission officially declared Museveni the winner of the presidential race, securing approximately 71.65% of the vote. This victory extends his rule to a remarkable 45 years, making him one of Africa’s longest-serving leaders.
Museveni defeated his closest rival, Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine, who garnered about 24.7% of the vote. Despite the significant margin, the election has stirred controversy and criticism from both local opposition parties and international observers.
The campaign period was tense, with widespread allegations that the election was neither free nor fair. Critics argued that opposition candidates faced intimidation and barriers to equal participation. These claims were particularly amplified by the government-imposed internet shutdown during the election period.
The Uganda Communications Commission (UCC) directed telecom operators to suspend public access to the internet starting January 13. Authorities cited concerns over “misinformation, electoral fraud, and risks of violence” as reasons for the blackout.
However, human rights organizations and civil society groups condemned the shutdown, describing it as a direct infringement on freedom of expression. They argued that cutting access to online platforms undermined transparency and public trust in the electoral process.
The blackout had far-reaching consequences beyond politics. Mobile money services, online businesses, and daily communication were all disrupted, affecting millions of Ugandans. Many citizens expressed frustration at being unable to connect with family, friends, or access essential services during a critical national event.
Partial internet access returned following the declaration of results, but social media platforms remained largely inaccessible. For many Ugandans, this meant missing critical discussions, updates, and independent coverage of the election.
Museveni, in defending his victory, maintained that the process had reflected the will of the people. He emphasized that his experience, accumulated over decades of leadership, provides a stabilizing force for Uganda amid regional and global uncertainties.
Bobi Wine and the National Unity Platform rejected the results, alleging widespread irregularities, including ballot stuffing and voter intimidation. The claims have sparked national debate and highlighted the deep political divide in Uganda.
International observers acknowledged that the voting process was largely peaceful but raised concerns about the overall political environment. They specifically cited the impact of the internet blackout, which hampered observers’ ability to monitor events and verify information in real time.
Despite criticism, Museveni remains confident in his mandate. He framed his seventh term as an opportunity to continue development projects, strengthen governance, and guide Uganda toward greater stability and economic growth.
Over the years, Museveni has consistently highlighted the importance of experience in leadership. He believes that decades of governance provide insights into managing crises, economic planning, and navigating complex international relations.
Supporters argue that Museveni’s longevity in office has contributed to Uganda’s relative stability compared to some neighboring countries that have faced repeated political upheavals. They see his continued leadership as a chance to leverage experience for national benefit.
Critics, however, stress the need for generational change and argue that prolonged rule can stifle innovation, limit democratic competition, and entrench power. The debate between experience and renewal remains central to Uganda’s political discourse.
Museveni’s statement, “I’m old, not dead,” has sparked both applause and criticism. To supporters, it is a bold affirmation of capability; to detractors, it underscores the challenge of transitioning leadership in a nation with long-standing incumbents.
As Uganda moves into this new chapter, the nation faces critical questions about governance, political inclusivity, and the role of technology in elections. The recent internet blackout serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between security concerns and democratic freedoms.
Ultimately, Museveni’s seventh term promises to be a period of both opportunity and challenge. With experience on his side and public scrutiny heightened, the path forward will test the resilience of Uganda’s democracy and the effectiveness of its leadership in meeting the needs of its people.
