Related Articles
Former intelligence officer Gen. David Sejusa has defended former Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC) Chairperson Mariam Wangandya, saying her recent actions should not be judged without first understanding the circumstances that may have influenced her decision to resign.
Sejusa said the public debate surrounding Wangandya’s conduct has focused heavily on her actions, but not enough attention has been given to what could have happened behind the scenes. He argued that there may be deeper issues that need to be examined before conclusions are made.
According to the former spy chief, Wangandya’s long career does not suggest someone who acts recklessly or without careful consideration. He described her as a respected professional whose record in public service and legal practice shows a history of discipline and sound judgment.
Sejusa pointed to Wangandya’s previous role as Deputy Inspector General of Government (IGG), her legal career, and her work with the Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), saying these achievements demonstrate the kind of person she has been throughout her professional life.
He questioned what could have caused such a major change, especially her decision to publicly criticize President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni despite knowing the possible consequences of such remarks.
Sejusa said Wangandya’s actions should not simply be interpreted as emotional reactions, but rather as possible signs of someone dealing with serious challenges. He suggested that there may be important details surrounding her resignation that are not yet known to the public.
The retired general also referred to Wangandya’s claims that she and her family had received threats. He questioned who could have been behind those threats and whether they contributed to the pressure she was reportedly facing.
He maintained that Wangandya should not be described as unstable, arguing instead that her situation appears to reflect someone who has been pushed into a difficult position.
“She is not a mad woman. She is someone on edge,” Sejusa said, stressing that her circumstances deserve attention and understanding.
He further called for a closer look at what he described as the hidden side of the matter, suggesting that investigating the circumstances surrounding her resignation could reveal factors or influences that are not currently in the public domain.
Sejusa added that President Museveni may already be aware of some of the issues surrounding the matter because of his position and access to information available through state structures.
Wangandya recently resigned from her position as Chairperson of the Uganda Human Rights Commission, ending her tenure before completing her six-year mandate. Her departure has sparked public debate about her leadership, her public statements, and the reasons behind her decision to leave office.
She still had about one year and two months remaining on her term, which was expected to end in September 2027. Her early resignation has continued to raise questions about the events and circumstances that led to her exit.
