https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/2EDfn/1/ []
Breaking News

Shock As Museveni Accuses NUP Of Planting 2.7 Million Fake Votes Into The System 1 million was printed at Nkrumah Road here in Kampala & 1.7 million was printed in Dubai

President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has accused the National Unity Platform (NUP), led by opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine, of printing and importing millions of fake ballots during Uganda’s January 15, 2026 presidential election.

The President claimed that one million ballots were printed locally at Nkrumah Road in Kampala, while an additional 1.7 million were allegedly printed in Dubai and smuggled into Uganda.

According to Museveni, these actions were discovered after the previous election cycle and represented a deliberate attempt to manipulate the results.

“When you hear that there is opposition, there is no opposition in Uganda. It is just cheating,” Museveni said, addressing journalists and senior military officers on January 28, 2026. His statement reflected his frustration over what he described as large-scale electoral deception.

Museveni, who was declared the winner of the 2026 election with 7,946,772 votes, representing 71.65% of the total, credited the Biometric Voter Verification Kits (BVVK) for detecting and blocking fraudulent attempts. He said these machines helped secure his victory over Bobi Wine, who received 2,741,238 votes, or 24.72%, according to the Electoral Commission.

The 81-year-old leader emphasized that despite technical and coordination challenges during the deployment of the BVVK machines, the technology proved effective in key areas. He cited Bulambuli District as an example where the kits blocked attempts at vote manipulation.

Museveni reiterated concerns he first raised on election day, January 15, when widespread failures of the BVVK machines delayed voting in several parts of the country. These failures coincided with a nationwide internet shutdown, adding further tension to the process.

At his polling station in Rwakitura, Kiruhura District, Museveni himself experienced initial rejection by the BVVK machine and was later verified through facial recognition technology. The incident highlighted the challenges of relying on biometric verification amid technical limitations.

The President questioned whether these failures were accidental or deliberate. He suggested that some Electoral Commission staff may have failed to upload operator biodata to the devices on time, a situation he said could amount to sabotage. In response, Museveni ordered formal investigations into the technical breakdowns.

According to Museveni, the alleged fake ballots posed a significant threat to the integrity of the election. He claimed that without the BVVK machines, the 2.7 million fraudulent votes could have altered the outcome and undermined Uganda’s democratic process.

The allegations have intensified political tensions nationwide. Bobi Wine’s supporters have strongly rejected the claims, accusing Museveni and his administration of using the story to justify the government’s crackdown on opposition activities.

Critics say that the allegations about Dubai-printed ballots are difficult to verify and may serve as a political tool to delegitimize the opposition. They argue that such claims could inflame an already tense environment and increase mistrust between citizens and the electoral system.

Bobi Wine’s camp has also accused Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Museveni’s son and Chief of Defence Forces, of deploying the military to influence the vote. Following a night raid on his home in Magere on January 16, Bobi Wine went into hiding, and his current whereabouts remain unknown amid heightened political tension.

The use of the military in election-related activities has been criticized by human rights organizations and opposition groups. They argue that the presence of armed forces around polling stations can intimidate voters and skew results in favor of the incumbent.

Museveni defended the government’s use of security forces as necessary to maintain order during elections. He insisted that Uganda remains a peaceful country, but acknowledged that opposition tactics often create unnecessary disruption.

Observers note that allegations of fake ballots are not new in Uganda’s electoral history. Previous elections have also faced accusations of fraud and manipulation, though claims involving foreign printing and smuggling, as Museveni described, represent a new escalation.

The Electoral Commission announced Museveni’s victory officially on January 17, 2026, but the opposition immediately rejected the results as fraudulent. This rejection has fueled ongoing debates about transparency and credibility in Uganda’s electoral process.

Museveni’s claims about 1.7 million ballots printed in Dubai suggest an international dimension to the alleged fraud. If verified, such claims could have significant diplomatic implications, especially with authorities in the United Arab Emirates and other international election observers.

The President’s remarks also emphasized the role of technology in safeguarding elections. Despite challenges, he credited the BVVK machines for preventing large-scale manipulation and ensuring that the final results reflected the will of the people, in his view.

As political tension continues to rise, citizens are watching closely. Many are concerned about stability, while others are drawn into partisan debates over the legitimacy of the election and the credibility of both government and opposition claims.

Uganda now faces a critical period in which allegations of fake ballots, technical failures, and military involvement will dominate political discourse.

How the government and opposition respond in the coming weeks will shape the country’s political climate and determine whether tensions escalate or are managed peacefully.

The unfolding situation underscores the deep divisions in Uganda’s politics. With strong claims from both the incumbent and the opposition, public confidence in the electoral process is being tested, making transparency, accountability, and open investigation more important than ever.

About West Nile

Check Also

Full List!! Here Are The 10 Cabinet Ministers Who Were Badly Defeated In Uganda’s 2026 Parliamentary Elections Uganda’s 2026 general elections have sent shockwaves across the country after ten serving cabinet ministers were badly defeated in parliamentary races. The results marked one of the most dramatic political moments in recent history and clearly showed a shift in voter mood. Across many regions, Ugandans used their votes to express frustration with long-serving leaders. The defeats reflected growing anger over economic hardship, unemployment, poor service delivery, and unfulfilled campaign promises. One of the most surprising losses was that of Beatrice Anywar, the Minister of Water and Environment. She lost the Kitgum Municipality seat to opposition candidate Dennis Onekalit Amere, ending her long political journey in Parliament. Anywar was once considered a strong political force, having served both in opposition and later in government. Her defeat shocked many supporters and showed how quickly political fortunes can change. In Ndorwa West County, David Bahati, the State Minister for Trade, Industry and Cooperatives, was also voted out. Bahati had lost the NRM primaries and chose to contest as an independent candidate. Despite his influence in the Kigezi region, voters rejected him at the ballot. His defeat marked the end of a long period of dominance and showed growing voter confidence in challenging powerful figures. One of the most talked-about races happened in Lira City, where two sitting cabinet ministers competed for the same seat. Betty Amongi, the Minister of Gender, Labour and Social Development, lost the Lira City Woman MP seat. She was defeated by Dr. Jane Ruth Aceng, the Minister of Health. This contest attracted national attention and highlighted internal competition within the ruling political class. Amongi’s defeat was widely seen as a strong message from voters who were unhappy with her political choices and leadership style. The loss also showed that holding a cabinet position does not guarantee victory. Another major defeat was that of Hamson Obua, the Government Chief Whip. He lost the Ajuri County seat despite his senior role in Parliament and close ties to the ruling party. Political analysts say Obua’s loss reflected growing dissatisfaction in northern Uganda, especially among young people facing unemployment and limited opportunities. Several other ministers were also swept out of Parliament. Moriku Kaducu, the State Minister for Primary Education, lost the Moyo District Woman MP race after a tough contest. John Mulimba, the State Minister for Foreign Affairs in charge of Regional Affairs, also failed to secure re-election. His loss added to the growing list of senior officials rejected by voters. In Chua County, Okello Oryem, the State Minister for Foreign Affairs responsible for International Affairs, was voted out. His defeat was another blow to the government’s top leadership. Frederick Ngobi Gume, the State Minister for Cooperatives, lost his Bulamogi North West seat in Kaliro District. Voters there chose change over continuity. Florence Nambozo Wamala, the State Minister for Karamoja Affairs, was defeated in the Sironko Woman MP race. Her loss showed that even regional ministers were not spared by voters. The final minister on the list was Peter Lokeris, the Minister for Karamoja Affairs, who lost the Chekwii East County seat. His defeat ended a long political career in Parliament. Across the country, voting patterns showed a strong desire for political renewal. Many voters openly supported new faces, especially in areas where leaders had stayed in power for many years. Opposition parties and independent candidates made strong gains, particularly in urban areas. At the same time, traditional ruling party strongholds showed clear signs of weakening. Political commentators described the election as a referendum on government performance. Many voters were unhappy with rising living costs, poor services, and lack of accountability. The loss of ten cabinet ministers has placed pressure on President Yoweri Museveni to rethink his Cabinet. While the law allows him to appoint ministers from outside Parliament, the defeats carry strong political meaning. NRM insiders admit that keeping defeated ministers in Cabinet could cause tension, especially as newly elected MPs push for leadership roles. As Uganda prepares for the 12th Parliament, one thing is clear. The House will be younger, more competitive, and less predictable than before. The 2026 elections delivered a powerful message from the people: no position is guaranteed, and even the most powerful ministers can be voted out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *